When the facts are such that the language used might have been meant to apply to any one, and could not have been meant to apply to more than one, of several persons or things, evidence may be given of facts which show which of those persons or things it was intended to apply to.
Illustrations
(a) A agrees to sell to B, for Rs. 1,000, "my white horse". A has two white
horses. Evidence may be give of facts which show which of them was meant.
(b) A agrees to accompany B to Haidarabad. Evidence may be given of facts showing whether Haidarabad in the Dekkhan or Haiderabad in Sind was meant.
Section 90A Presumption as to electronic records five years old
Section 92 Exclusion of evidence of oral agreement
Section 93 Exclusion of evidence to explain or amend ambiguous document
Section 94 Exclusion of evidence against application of document to existing facts
Section 95 Evidence as to document unmeaning in reference to existing facts
Section 96 Evidence as to application of language which can apply to one only of several persons
Section 98 Evidence as to meaning of illegible characters, etc
Section 99 Who may give evidence of agreement varying terms of document
Section 100 Saving of provisions of Indian Succession Act relating to wills