Where any electronic record, purporting or proved to be five years old, is produced from any custody which the Court in the particular case considers proper, the Court may presume that the 2[electronic signature] which purports to be the 2[electronic signature] of any particular person was so affixed by him or any person authorised by him in this behalf.
Explanation. Electronic records are said to be in proper custody if they are
in the place in which, and under the care of the person with whom, they
naturally be; but no custody is improper if it is proved to have had a
legitimate origin, or the circumstances of the particular case are such as to
render such an origin probable.
This Explanation applies also to section 81A.]
--------------------
1. Ins. by Act 21 of 2000, s. 92 and the Second Schedule (w.e.f. 17-10-2000).
2. Subs. by Act 10 of 2009, s. 52, for "Digital Signature" (w.e.f. 27.10.2009).
Section 90A Presumption as to electronic records five years old
Section 92 Exclusion of evidence of oral agreement
Section 93 Exclusion of evidence to explain or amend ambiguous document
Section 94 Exclusion of evidence against application of document to existing facts
Section 95 Evidence as to document unmeaning in reference to existing facts
Section 96 Evidence as to application of language which can apply to one only of several persons
Section 98 Evidence as to meaning of illegible characters, etc
Section 99 Who may give evidence of agreement varying terms of document
Section 100 Saving of provisions of Indian Succession Act relating to wills