When the language used applies partly to one set of existing facts, and partly to another set of existing facts, but the whole of it does not apply correctly to either, evidence may be given to show to which of the two it was meant to apply.
Illustration
A agrees to sell to B "my land at X in the occupation of Y". A has land at X,
but not in the occupation of Y, and he has land in the occupation of Y but it is
not at X. Evidence may be given of facts showing which he meant to sell.
Section 90A Presumption as to electronic records five years old
Section 92 Exclusion of evidence of oral agreement
Section 93 Exclusion of evidence to explain or amend ambiguous document
Section 94 Exclusion of evidence against application of document to existing facts
Section 95 Evidence as to document unmeaning in reference to existing facts
Section 96 Evidence as to application of language which can apply to one only of several persons
Section 98 Evidence as to meaning of illegible characters, etc
Section 99 Who may give evidence of agreement varying terms of document
Section 100 Saving of provisions of Indian Succession Act relating to wills