When language used in a document is plain in itself, and when it applies accurately to existing facts, evidence may not be given to show that it was not meant to apply to such facts.
Illustration
A sells to B, by deed, "my estate at Rampur containing 100 bighas". A has an
estate at Rampur containing 100 bighas. Evidence may not be given of the fact
that the estate meant to be sold was one situated at a different place and of a
different size.
Section 90A Presumption as to electronic records five years old
Section 92 Exclusion of evidence of oral agreement
Section 93 Exclusion of evidence to explain or amend ambiguous document
Section 94 Exclusion of evidence against application of document to existing facts
Section 95 Evidence as to document unmeaning in reference to existing facts
Section 96 Evidence as to application of language which can apply to one only of several persons
Section 98 Evidence as to meaning of illegible characters, etc
Section 99 Who may give evidence of agreement varying terms of document
Section 100 Saving of provisions of Indian Succession Act relating to wills